Personalize the values of the columns of the MAP in TE ?

nico42

#1 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

I search to personalize the values of the MAP in the tables in TE. Is it possible ?

Stinky

#2 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

yeah, just highlight the cel you want to change and type in a new number.

nico42

#3 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

I want to change these values :

Image

Stinky

#4 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

what would you change those to? They are refferance points. It says what the manifold pressure is and the RPM to figure out what fuel trimming to do.

You can change the multiplier for the fuel in the "prperties", "fuel multipliers" table. SO that it adds more fuel or takes some away at those values. But I really dont see what you need those values to read any different for?

If you really insist on changing them, then start tearing into the coding of the program, figure out where he labeled them at and chance them to read whatever your heart desires.

Stinky

#5 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

thats not in PSI either. It Hg

I forget the metric "name" for it. Kinda odd though, being in Canada and all...... the numbers seem to only make sense to me in PSI.

nico42

#6 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

I want to change them so that it is as in ODB0Edit.

Or find the correspondences between TE and ODB0Edit :?

jonnyvtec

#7 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

Its the vacuum in Inches of mercury in a manometerm hence InHg.

-31 ish is pure vacuum so -15 is just over 0.5 bar of absolute pressure.

hackish

#8 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

It would be nice to have a setting that allows kpa, kpaa, in hg/psi etc.

Something I would really like is the ability to set the RPM markers. I've built an engine that revs to 8000. It's hard to use a map that goes only to 7400 since the fuel requirements start to fall at the top end.

-Michael

Stinky

#9 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

I think thats a problem of the ecu itself though. Since the ecu is set for a certain size table, I am not sure that you can add cells to it as more RPM and have the ecu actually access them.

I may be way off here. I know you can add cells for boost, but do not think you can add them down.

nico42

#10 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

Ok, but why the values are different for a same map when you edit it in TE or ODB0Edit ? One of the two softwares are wrong ?

Stinky

#11 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

at some point obdo edit turns to PSI.

I cant answer your question though. I dont know.

All I can say is that I open the bin up. I edit it and the ecu runs the car with no problems.

The numbers displayed on the top and sides do NOT change anything that the ecu sees.

It could say -100, -20, +50, +1000,......... and your actual ECU will still rin the same. You could make it say "charlie brown" and it would not effect annything.

The only thing that gets messed up is when you are datalogging and trying to cross refferance the row and column to the TE. If its off, then you may end up looking at the wrong values for tuning.

But I still dont know your answer. Sorry.

nico42

#12 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

Ok thanks for your answer :wink:

If the ECU see the sames values, it doesn't change anything. That reassures me.

But one of two softwares don't display the right value, sure.
Remain to know which :roll:

Rory

#13 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

I have no idea about OBD0Edit, but I do know that the column headings in TE with ng60 are correct.

Making changes to the fuel maps results in the afr changing accordingly at the expected load / rpm location.

RC000E

#14 โ—ˆ 2016-04-02

jonnyvtec wrote:
Its the vacuum in Inches of mercury in a manometerm hence InHg.

-31 ish is pure vacuum so -15 is just over 0.5 bar of absolute pressure.


Well, I have been havin this same issue. What is the actual conversion for this, so that I can make a reference chart. I am using a map Blundell put up a while back.

It goes ...-17, -16, -6.1, -5.9, -5.5, -5.1, -4.7, -4.3, -3.9, -3.4, -3.1, etc. all the way down to -.08.

I have several cars running off this map well (using Blundell's as a base, then retuning each as needed), just havin a hard time loggin with the wideband and tuning because I am never sure which row I am referencing.

I am running 2.5.2 version, does 2.5.5 change this? Not like I don't need the new version anyway.